Bobcat T66 vs Caterpillar 255
Two compact track loaders, all 11 fields on the same rows, from the manufacturers' own documents.
Both unit systems are shown; the selected one comes first. Brackets mark our approximate conversions.
Imperial units first.
- Bobcat T66
- Compact track loader · Original T66. Documented market: North America (English manufacturer page); country-specific and serial applicability not established.
- Caterpillar 255
- Compact track loader · Build 05A. Documented market: North America, EU, Chile, Turkey, Colombia and South Korea.
A figure without a marker is the only row the source publishes. A marker flags a figure that varies by version, conflicting evidence, or several rows; follow it to the model page, which lists every row with its source location.
Spec for spec
"Highest" (in yellow, with a triangle) marks the top value only where both machines have one supported figure. Ranges and qualified figures are never ranked.
| Bobcat T66 | Caterpillar 255 | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 8,840 lb / 4,010 kgPublishedConfiguration and included equipment are not specified in this row. | 9,578 lb / 4,345 kgPublishedOpen canopy base configuration.Highest |
| Machine width | 67 in / 1,702 mmPublishedMachine overall width; not a bucket width. Track configuration is not specified in this row. | 65.9–69.3 in / 1,675–1,760 mm2 figures |
| Height | 80.5 in / 2,045 mmPublishedOverall height as labelled; no separate raised-arm height implied. | 83.3 in / 2,115 mmPublishedHeight to top of cab, not maximum raised height.Highest |
| Length with bucket | 134.9 in / 3,427 mmPublishedWith standard bucket. | 135 in / 3,430 mmPublishedLength with bucket on ground.Highest |
| Length without bucket / attachment | 107 in / 2,718 mmPublishedWithout attachment. | 110.2 in / 2,800 mmPublishedWithout bucket; source does not state that every attachment is removed.Highest |
| Engine power | 74 hp / 55.2 kWPublished; unit definition unspecifiedGross/net basis and horsepower definition are not stated; retain the published pair. | 73.0–74.0 hp / 54.4–55.4 kWPublished; unit definition unspecified3 figures |
| Rated operating capacity | 1,065–1,588 kgNot every row is published in imperial unitsVaries by version | 2,499–3,570 lb / 1,133–1,619 kg3 figures |
| Tipping load | 3,045–3,175 kgNot every row is published in imperial unitsVaries by version | 7,140 lb / 3,238 kgPublishedPublished base configuration; no optional counterweight. |
| Standard hydraulic flow | 17.6 gpm / 66.5 L/minPublished; unit definition unspecifiedStandard auxiliary flow; gallon definition not specified. Both values are published. | 20 gpm / 76 L/minPublished; unit definition unspecifiedStandard hydraulic flow; source writes gal/min without specifying gallon type.Highest |
| High hydraulic flow | 26.9 gpm / 101.8 L/minPublished; unit definition unspecifiedHigh-flow auxiliary configuration; gallon definition not specified. Both values are published. | 30 gpm / 113 L/minPublished; unit definition unspecified2 figures |
| Hydraulic pressure | 3,500 psi / 24,000 kPaPublishedRelief pressure at quick couplers. Published metric and US values are retained, including manufacturer rounding. | 3,500–4,061 psi / 24,130–28,000 kPa3 figures |
Full spec sheets: Bobcat T66 · Caterpillar 255
More comparisons
- Bobcat T66 vs Bobcat T76
- Bobcat T76 vs Bobcat T770
- Bobcat T770 vs Bobcat T86
- Bobcat T86 vs Bobcat T870
- Bobcat T590 vs Bobcat T595
- Caterpillar 279D vs Caterpillar 289D
- Kubota SSV65 vs Kubota SSV75
- Bobcat T66 vs Kubota SVL75-2
- Bobcat T76 vs Caterpillar 289D
- Bobcat T770 vs Kubota SVL95-2s
- Bobcat T86 vs Bobcat T86-2
- Bobcat T86 vs Caterpillar 299D3
- Bobcat T770 vs Caterpillar 299D3
- Bobcat T770 vs Kubota SVL97-2