Bobcat T86 vs Caterpillar 299D3
Two compact track loaders, all 11 fields on the same rows, from the manufacturers' own documents.
Both unit systems are shown; the selected one comes first. Brackets mark our approximate conversions.
Imperial units first.
- Bobcat T86
- Compact track loader · Original T86. Documented market: North America (English manufacturer page); country-specific and serial applicability not established.
- Caterpillar 299D3
- Compact track loader · D3. Documented market: North America included; document states Am North, EU, APD, ANZP, HRC.
A figure without a marker is the only row the source publishes. A marker flags a figure that varies by version, conflicting evidence, or several rows; follow it to the model page, which lists every row with its source location.
Spec for spec
"Highest" (in yellow, with a triangle) marks the top value only where both machines have one supported figure. Ranges and qualified figures are never ranked.
| Bobcat T86 | Caterpillar 299D3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 11,477 lb / 5,206 kgPublishedColumn 1: T86. Included equipment is not specified in this row.Highest | 11,464 lb / 5,200 kgPublishedBase configuration in dimension-page footnote. |
| Machine width | 78 in / 1,981.1 mmPublishedColumn 1: T86. Overall machine width; bucket width is a separate source row. | Not stated |
| Height | 83.1 in / 2,110.7 mmPublishedColumn 1: T86. Overall height; not raised-arm height. | 83.6 in / 2,125 mmPublishedHeight to top of cab, not maximum raised height.Highest |
| Length with bucket | 153.5 in / 3,899.5 mmPublishedColumn 1: T86. With standard bucket. | 154.7 in / 3,931 mmPublishedLength with bucket on ground.Highest |
| Length without bucket / attachment | 120.4 in / 3,058.8 mmPublishedColumn 1: T86. Without attachment. | 125.5 in / 3,189 mmPublishedWithout bucket; source does not state that every attachment is removed.Highest |
| Engine power | 110 hp / 82 kWPublished; unit definition unspecifiedColumn 1: T86. Gross/net basis and horsepower definition are not stated; published values are retained. | 95–98 hp / 71–73 kWPublished; unit definition unspecified3 figures |
| Rated operating capacity | 1,678–2,462 kgNot every row is published in imperial unitsVaries by version | 3,480–5,240 lb / 1,580–2,380 kg3 figures |
| Tipping load | 5 published rowsConflicting | 9,945 lb / 4,520 kgPublishedBase configuration without optional counterweight. |
| Standard hydraulic flow | 23 gpm / 87.1 L/minPublished; unit definition unspecifiedColumn 1: T86. Standard auxiliary flow. Gallon definition is unspecified; published unit pairs are retained.Highest | 23 gpm / 86 L/minPublished; unit definition unspecifiedStandard hydraulic flow; source writes gal/min without specifying gallon type. |
| High hydraulic flow | 36.6–42.0 gpm / 138.5–159.0 L/minPublished; unit definition unspecified3 figures | 32 gpm / 121 L/minPublished; unit definition unspecifiedHigh Flow XPS hydraulic configuration; source writes gal/min without specifying gallon type. |
| Hydraulic pressure | 3,450–4,111 psiVaries by version | 3,335–4,061 psi / 23,000–28,000 kPa2 figures |
Full spec sheets: Bobcat T86 · Caterpillar 299D3
More comparisons
- Bobcat T66 vs Bobcat T76
- Bobcat T76 vs Bobcat T770
- Bobcat T770 vs Bobcat T86
- Bobcat T86 vs Bobcat T870
- Bobcat T590 vs Bobcat T595
- Caterpillar 279D vs Caterpillar 289D
- Kubota SSV65 vs Kubota SSV75
- Bobcat T66 vs Kubota SVL75-2
- Bobcat T76 vs Caterpillar 289D
- Bobcat T770 vs Kubota SVL95-2s
- Bobcat T86 vs Bobcat T86-2
- Bobcat T770 vs Caterpillar 299D3
- Bobcat T770 vs Kubota SVL97-2
- Bobcat T66 vs Caterpillar 255