Bobcat T86 vs Bobcat T86-2
Two compact track loaders, all 11 fields on the same rows, from the manufacturers' own documents.
Both unit systems are shown; the selected one comes first. Brackets mark our approximate conversions.
Imperial units first.
- Bobcat T86
- Compact track loader · Original T86. Documented market: North America (English manufacturer page); country-specific and serial applicability not established.
- Bobcat T86-2
- Compact track loader · T86-2. Documented market: North America (English manufacturer page); country-specific and serial applicability not established.
A figure without a marker is the only row the source publishes. A marker flags a figure that varies by version, conflicting evidence, or several rows; follow it to the model page, which lists every row with its source location.
Spec for spec
"Highest" (in yellow, with a triangle) marks the top value only where both machines have one supported figure. Ranges and qualified figures are never ranked.
| Bobcat T86 | Bobcat T86-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 11,477 lb / 5,206 kgPublishedColumn 1: T86. Included equipment is not specified in this row. | 12,104 lb / 5,490 kgPublishedColumn 1: T86-2. Included equipment, operator and cabin configuration are not specified in this row.Highest |
| Machine width | 78 in / 1,981.1 mmPublishedColumn 1: T86. Overall machine width; bucket width is a separate source row.Highest | 78 in / 1,981.1 mmPublishedColumn 1: T86-2. Overall machine width; attachment width and individual track width are separate source rows.Highest |
| Height | 83.1 in / 2,110.7 mmPublishedColumn 1: T86. Overall height; not raised-arm height.Highest | 83.1 in / 2,110.7 mmPublishedColumn 1: T86-2. Overall machine height, not hinge-pin height.Highest |
| Length with bucket | 153.5 in / 3,899.5 mmPublishedColumn 1: T86. With standard bucket.Highest | 148.9 in / 3,782.5 mmPublishedColumn 1: T86-2. With standard bucket. Both published unit views are retained without correction. |
| Length without bucket / attachment | 120.4 in / 3,058.8 mmPublishedColumn 1: T86. Without attachment. | 145.6 in / 3,697.5 mmPublishedColumn 1: T86-2. Without attachment. Both published unit views are retained without substituting a predecessor model.Highest |
| Engine power | 110 hp / 82 kWPublished; unit definition unspecifiedColumn 1: T86. Gross/net basis and horsepower definition are not stated; published values are retained. | 115 hp / 85.8 kWPublished; unit definition unspecifiedColumn 1: T86-2. Engine horsepower; gross/net basis, rating standard and rated engine speed are not stated in this row.Highest |
| Rated operating capacity | 1,678–2,462 kgNot every row is published in imperial unitsVaries by version | 1,678–1,916 kgNot every row is published in imperial units6 figures |
| Tipping load | 5 published rowsConflicting | 4,795–5,087 kgNot every row is published in imperial unitsVaries by version |
| Standard hydraulic flow | 23 gpm / 87.1 L/minPublished; unit definition unspecifiedColumn 1: T86. Standard auxiliary flow. Gallon definition is unspecified; published unit pairs are retained.Highest | 23 gpm / 87.1 L/minPublished; unit definition unspecifiedColumn 1: T86-2. Standard auxiliary flow. Gallon definition is not stated.Highest |
| High hydraulic flow | 36.6–42.0 gpm / 138.5–159.0 L/minPublished; unit definition unspecified3 figures | 36.6–42.0 gpm / 138.5–159.0 L/minPublished; unit definition unspecified2 figures |
| Hydraulic pressure | 3,450–4,111 psiVaries by version | 3,500–4,061 psi / 24,150–28,000 kPa2 figures |
Full spec sheets: Bobcat T86 · Bobcat T86-2
More comparisons
- Bobcat T66 vs Bobcat T76
- Bobcat T76 vs Bobcat T770
- Bobcat T770 vs Bobcat T86
- Bobcat T86 vs Bobcat T870
- Bobcat T590 vs Bobcat T595
- Caterpillar 279D vs Caterpillar 289D
- Kubota SSV65 vs Kubota SSV75
- Bobcat T66 vs Kubota SVL75-2
- Bobcat T76 vs Caterpillar 289D
- Bobcat T770 vs Kubota SVL95-2s
- Bobcat T86 vs Caterpillar 299D3
- Bobcat T770 vs Caterpillar 299D3
- Bobcat T770 vs Kubota SVL97-2
- Bobcat T66 vs Caterpillar 255