John Deere 317G vs John Deere 325G
Operating weight is 8,423–8,683 lb / 3,824–3,942 kg on the 317G and 9,500–9,650 lb / 4,313–4,381 kg on the 325G; the 325G has 9 hp / 6.3 kW more gross power: 74 hp / 54.8 kW against 65 hp / 48.5 kW; the 325G is rated to lift 465 lb / 211 kg more at 35% of tipping load: 2,590 lb / 1,176 kg against 2,125 lb / 965 kg.
Spec for spec
Both unit systems are shown; the selected one comes first. Brackets mark our approximate conversions.
Imperial units first.
Two compact track loaders, all 11 fields on the same rows, from the manufacturers' own documents. "Highest" (in yellow, with a triangle) marks a capability figure that beats every other in its row in both unit systems, where each machine has one figure to compare: lift capacity on the same stated rating basis, engine power on each gross or net rating they share. Ties, weights and dimensions are never marked.
| John Deere 317G | John Deere 325G | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating weight | 8,423–8,683 lb / 3,824–3,942 kg2 figures | 9,500–9,650 lb / 4,313–4,381 kg2 figures |
| Machine width | 65.0–71.5 in / 5 published rowsConflicting | 71.5–74.7 in / (1,816)–(1,897) mm2 figures |
| Height | 78.5 in / (1,994 mm)Published · Approximate conversion | 81.1 in / (2,060 mm)Published · Approximate conversion |
| Length with bucket | 127.6–137.4 in / (3,241)–(3,490) mm2 figures | 136.3 in / (3,462 mm)Published · Approximate conversion |
| Length without bucket / attachment | 103.0 in / (2,616 mm)Published · Approximate conversion | 112.3 in / (2,852 mm)Published · Approximate conversion |
| Engine power | 61–65 hp / 45.6–48.5 kW2 figures | 70–74 hp / 52.5–54.8 kW2 figuresHighest |
| Rated operating capacityThe load the manufacturer rates the loader to carry, set as a share of its tipping load. | 2,125 lb / 965 kg35% of tipping load3 figures | 2,590 lb / 1,176 kg35% of tipping load2 figuresHighest |
| Tipping load | 6,070 lb / 2,756 kgPublished | 7,400 lb / 3,360 kgPublishedHighest |
| Standard hydraulic flow | 17 gpm / 63 L/minStandard | 21 gpm / 78 L/minStandardHighest |
| High hydraulic flow | Not stated | 32 gpm / 120 L/minHigh Flow |
| Hydraulic pressure | 3,450 psi / 23,787 kPaPublished | 3,450 psi / 23,787 kPaPublished |
A figure without a marker is the only row the source publishes. A marker flags a figure that varies by version, conflicting evidence, or several rows; follow it to the model page, which lists every row with its source location.
Full spec sheets: John Deere 317G · John Deere 325G
Generation and market
- John Deere 317G
- Compact track loader · G-Series. Documented market: EPA Final Tier 4 / EU Stage IV specification; options and accessories are not available in all regions.
- John Deere 325G
- Compact track loader · G-Series. Documented market: EPA Final Tier 4 / EU Stage IV specification; options and accessories are not available in all regions.
More comparisons
- Bobcat T66 vs Bobcat T76
- Bobcat T76 vs Bobcat T770
- Bobcat T770 vs Bobcat T86
- Bobcat T86 vs Bobcat T870
- Bobcat T590 vs Bobcat T595
- Caterpillar 279D vs Caterpillar 289D
- Kubota SSV65 vs Kubota SSV75
- Bobcat T66 vs Kubota SVL75-2
- Bobcat T76 vs Caterpillar 289D
- Bobcat T770 vs Kubota SVL95-2s
- Bobcat T86 vs Bobcat T86-2
- Bobcat T86 vs Caterpillar 299D3
- Bobcat T770 vs Caterpillar 299D3
- Bobcat T770 vs Kubota SVL97-2
- Bobcat T66 vs Caterpillar 255
- Bobcat T770 vs John Deere 333G
- John Deere 325G vs John Deere 333G
- John Deere 333G vs Takeuchi TL12V-2
- Takeuchi TL8R-2 vs Takeuchi TL10V-2